Attached is a document describing the strategies for converting a face-to-face training into a blended training. The blended training will include both face-to-face instruction and online interaction. Some of the strategies I have included are developing visual aids such as presentations, animations and graphs. I also mention how the discussions can continue in both environments and the trainer must establish guidelines for the participation in both the online and face-to-face instruction.
Open document below:
Converting to Distance Learning Format
Distance Learning
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Open Course Analysis
This open course does include materials that seemed
to be pre-planned and designed for distance learning. The materials include
podcasts, videos, PowerPoints, wikis, and transcripts of lectures and other
vital information. The materials are broken down into units and each set of
materials support that unit topic. The organization, however, makes it
difficult to understand what is seen. For this course, a great understanding
and prior knowledge in chemistry would be needed. There are terms that pertain
more to the field of chemistry. It is an environment that keeps the learners’
mind and concentration on chemistry.
Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek (2012) stated that
“well-designed instruction is repeatable” which this course clearly does that.
Learners can access the same material each term or whenever they access it.
When it comes to distance learning, the “focus of the
instruction shifts to visual presentations” (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and
Zvacek, 2012). This course has both visual and audio presentations. The
powerpoints include pictures, diagrams, animations, and emphasis on certain
words by using contrasting colors or bold letters. The wikis also have information and visuals
for note-taking. There are homework problems available for each unit that can
be worked out independently or collaboratively. There are several materials
delivered to maximize the learning in this course.
Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek (2012) also
stated that distance learning faculty should prepare in the event that
technical problems occur. One way that I see this preparation is in the fact
that all of the materials and assignments are already posted. All of the
content is already accessible and not posted over time or each week. There are
instructions for how to open materials and choices of which format to view or
listen to.
This course offers questions and situations to ponder
and to add to the discussions and further critical thought. The course also contains exam questions for
review, along with answer keys. The first few were not available, but the ones
that were available include open-ended questions with time frames for each
question. The overall course is learner-centered in that the learner is
actively learning and not seated in a classroom listening to a lecture; and the
course’s faculty is “primarily designers” (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and
Zvacek, 2012) of the courses. The instructor is not an active participant
during the course.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012).
Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education
(5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson
Monday, May 27, 2013
Selecting Distance Learning Technologies
Example 2: Interactive Tours
A high school history teacher, located on the
west coast of the United States, wants to showcase to her students new exhibits
being held at two prominent New York City museums. The teacher wants her
students to take a "tour" of the museums and be able to interact with
the museum curators, as well as see the art work on display. Afterward, the
teacher would like to choose two pieces of artwork from each exhibit and have
the students participate in a group critique of the individual work of art. As
a novice of distance learning and distance learning technologies, the teacher
turned to the school district’s instructional designer for assistance. In the
role of the instructional designer, what distance learning technologies would
you suggest the teacher use to provide the best learning experience for her
students?
The teacher has come up with a great idea to engage students and
also allow them to tour actual art museums at a distance. One of the benefits
is that using computers in the classrooms “reduce the need for special
high-cost equipment or special networking” (Simonson, 2012). It also cuts the
costs of travel and lodging when traveling from the west coast of the US to New
York City which is on the east coast. A virtual tour still gives students that
opportunity to experience visiting a New York museum. This is a great example
of distance learning.
The Museum of Modern Art is a great site for students of all ages
to explore the exhibitions at this museum. The “Explore” tab includes
information on that exhibition, videos and pictures. Students can explore these
exhibitions, listen and watch the videos as if on an actual tour with a tour
guide, and answer questions as they go along. The “Learn” tab will allow the
educator to use slide shows of art work in the classroom and have students
answer questions along the way. This can be used a whole class assignment or
independently. Working independently, students can work at their own computers,
maybe with a partner, and explore these different pieces of art work as they
complete questions to support their understanding.
The Frick Collection is also another great art museum. It has an
online virtual tour where students can explore the actual museum and interact
with the art work pieces. As the students make their way down the halls of this
museum, they can click on art work and background information will pop up on
that art piece. It gives the feel of actually touring the museum. There are
also online lectures and videos. Its elegance does not fit well young visitors,
but the Columbia Spectator calls it an easy fit “into the art repertoire of a
New York college student” (Corry, 2010). This can get the high school students
into the feel of college courses and exploring pieces as a college student,
building their higher level thinking skills.
Simonson,
M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and
learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston,
MA: Pearson=
Corry, F. 2010. Reframing
the Frick as Student-Friendly. Columbia Spectator. http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2010/10/15/reframing-frick-student-friendly
Sunday, May 12, 2013
My Definition of Distance Learning
My definition of distance learning comes in two different
types. To me, distance learning is the process of learning information that is
presented from another person or organization in a different location. In general, this can mean simply the information
gained from internet searches or informational websites such as Wikipedia or
sites more reliable. People and organizations post information on the World
Wide Web all the time and the information is available for anyone who has
access online. A person can go online and obtain information on just about any
topic there is to know about. Demonstrations and tutorials can also be
accessed.
The other type of distance learning is what I consider
distance education. Distance education is obtaining information and skills like
the above description, but in the form of a course. Courses are given online
through universities or other institutions. Distance education can also be
through courses through organizations. Some companies forward learning material
to their employees.
In other words, I see distance learning as a person
obtaining information from others around the world either through books,
magazines, internet, or other ways of obtaining information for personal use;
and distance education as this same thing, but within the structure and
standards of a university, institution, or organization. To me, distance
learning is informal, and distance education is formal. Simonson discusses
distance learning as a part of distance education: there’s distance teaching
and distance learning that makes up distance education. (Simonson, video) What
I call distance learning, he calls “self-learning at a distance” (Simonson,
video), which I can go along with that term.
I see distance learning growing and becoming even more
popular than it is now. Since the time I
felt unsure about distance education, its popularity has grown and technologies
are constantly improving and providing opportunities for distance
communication. This week’s multimedia program includes how technological tools
such as web 2.0 tools are greatly used and contributing to the growth of
distance learning. Technological tools are constantly being implemented within
companies and organizations, and school systems are also implementing new
technologies to communicate with students and parents.
Multimedia
Program: "Distance Learning
Timeline Continuum"
Simonson, M. Video Program:
"Distance Education: The Next Generation"
Monday, May 6, 2013
Welcome to the blog!
Hello classmates and visitors! Welcome to my blog for the Distance Learning course. My name is Amy McCutcheon (I got married recently), and I am excited to continue through this journey in the Instructional Technology and Design program. There are lots of exciting uses of technology out there, and I can't wait to learn even more within this course. One example would be the use of this blog! As the course progresses, feel free to stop by here and comment! Don't forget to subscribe!
Thanks for visiting!
Thanks for visiting!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
